What ethical concern arises when a speech-language pathologist asks an assistant to interpret test results for a patient?

When a speech-language pathologist asks an assistant to interpret test results for a patient, the ethical concern fundamentally revolves around the appropriateness of delegating clinical responsibilities that require specific expertise and training. Speech-language pathologists are licensed professionals who have a duty to ensure that patients receive accurate and qualified assessments. By placing the responsibility of interpreting test results in the hands of an assistant, there is a risk that the assistant may not have the necessary qualifications, knowledge, or authority to convey that information accurately. This can lead to potentially harmful consequences, including the patient receiving incorrect information regarding their diagnosis or treatment.

Furthermore, ethical standards in the field mandate that individuals provide services only within their scope of competence. Therefore, by bypassing this critical aspect of ethical practice, there is a significant concern about the integrity of professional standards and the welfare of the patient. The act of relying on someone without the requisite expertise for interpreting such significant information presents a major ethical dilemma, ultimately leading to misrepresentation of professional responsibilities and standards in patient care.