What must a speech-language pathologist do if a client with mental capacity disagrees with a proposed intervention?

When a client with mental capacity disagrees with a proposed intervention, it is essential for a speech-language pathologist to respect the patient's wishes. This approach aligns with the ethical principle of autonomy, which emphasizes that individuals have the right to make their own decisions regarding their healthcare and interventions, as long as they are deemed capable of understanding the implications of those decisions.

Respecting a client's wishes not only upholds their rights but also fosters trust and collaboration in the therapeutic relationship. When clients feel that their opinions and desires are valued, it can lead to increased engagement in their treatment and better outcomes. By honoring their preferences, the speech-language pathologist reinforces the importance of client-centered care, which is crucial for effective rehabilitation.

Other options, such as overriding the patient's decision, would violate that autonomy and potentially lead to distrust or disengagement. Consulting with a supervisor or seeking legal counsel may be appropriate in complex situations, but they are not the primary actions in response to a client’s disagreement when the client has mental capacity. Therefore, respecting the patient's wishes is the most ethical and appropriate course of action.